All About REVIEWS!

Some people won't stop giving escorts bad reviews.
I'm not saying that hobbyist shouldn't give a BAD review,
It's okay to give one if it's really TRUE (not a made up story!)

Some of them just wants to ruin an escort's reputation!

I had experienced one, a guy gave me a review

The BIG QUESTION:
How can he gave me a review that we have met "march 10, 2010
when he just registered last march 15, 2010?


*** Sorry guys, I edited my post just to be more SPECIFIC!!! ;)

true its happens alot , what i suggest you is you send the admin the situation and maybe they could help.

All reviews have an effect on the career of the escort, negative or positive, it all depends. By this reason I would like to know, if the escort has the right to allow the customer to write a review or not.
The escort is entitled to protection of her personality. If somebody is disregarding this claim, all the PC experts here should help to catch the offender. kengel, German

Holla Kay , you are right but the problem not solved and the bad review still there and anyone can read it , if its not true then you have to do something !!

Hello,
please allow me to give some comments from clients' side.
For the passed seven months I have had an eye on the reaction of some escorts when they had to accept critical/bad reviews. Self-criticism does not seem to be a character trait of some escorts. There are reaction patterns visible which can be identified again and again. Critical, bad or poor reviews are simply declared being false. Well let's have a look on reviews which escorts declare being "false". Please be aware, I do not want to say that there are no false reviews in the web. False reviews also are faked reviews from provider side, right.

Consequently on the field of "bad" reviews we have to distinguish.
a)
False reviews reporting about encounters which never took place;
Doing something like this is simply a very bad style and manner from client or competitors' pimps side. On this field there a really dirty reviews in the web.
b)
Bad, poor or critical reviews about which provider and client involved may disagree; :-)

Furthermore there are not bad reviews which are false. There are also good and excellent reviews which are false, because
a)
The encounter never took place. A review was posted by the provider herself/himself, by a pimp, by a "john" or by an engaged ("professional") writer.
In worst case it is copied from an other provider's website. Escort websites are full of these reviews.
By the way has anybody ever read a critical or even poor review on an escort's website?
b)
A glorifying review for an escort without any objectivity and value for other hobbyists. Clients are different. They have different priorities, interests, expectations and cultural backgrounds. Some guys might be happy with a stone or starfish, because they simply are horny. Some guys receive a covered BJ, nothing else, and post very good reviews appreciating the escort's sexual skills.
A good escort for ST services might fail when she is going on LTR and vice versa.

Cutting a long story short both types of reviews positive ones and negative ones can be seen critical. Normally no provider complains a good review, does not matter if it is justified or not.
"Hello guys, my last good review is a wrong one, I never had a date with this man." We will never read something like this! ;-)

For a hobbyist it is certainly easier to write good reviews. The escort is happy (justified or not) and he avoids having problems with an escort's "defence strategies".
What are "defence strategies"? Well, simply the reaction of an escort after having received a "bad" review.
There are different types:

a) The easy type
"I never met this man."

b) The horrible and fictive story
"This man is a bad man. He was rude and dirty and blackmailed me all the time."
The horrible story in combination with the Asian phenomena of losing face is a class of its own in this category.

c) The comedy
"He wanted to marry me (after one day). He fell in love and was attracted by my class of its own personality. But I rejected his offer. And now he wants to bring me down."

Standard defence strategies never discuss the message of an review. This is logical, because the key message might be justified.

In my eyes the best reaction on a review which is not fair in an escort's eyes is being sovereign. There are human beings involved. Some persons can have a good time together and some cannot. There is no guaranty!

"I am sorry, that my companionship did not meet your expectations", would be a final sentence of a sovereign statement from escort side.

I would like to express my opinion about the importance of reviews for an escort's business. I personally do not take reviews being highly important, because they tend to be subjective. A good presentation of a provider, for ex. as an active member in the forum, convinces me much more than dozens of good reviews.

Finally what can be done against really false reviews?
It is certainly not a solution that reviews have to be approved by the concerned escort. Such an approach would be absurd, because the second half of truth would get lost! Then we would have the quality which we are facing on escorts' websites. Having an open discussion about reviews in a forum is also absurd, because discretion should be mutually respected.
A lady presenting everything she has or she has not in cyberspace has nothing else to lose. A hobbyist normally has.

Everywhere in service business where reputation is important and quality is reviewed by subjective reviewers we face this problem. Restaurants and hotels are tested by anonymous persons. Sometimes these persons have never been a guest of the hotel or have had a dinner in the restaurant. Often we are complained, because a guest has a bad day. Then we stand there, are friendly and hide our fist under the table. But I have to admit, I have never had a bad and critical review in my business or a simple complaint which has been completely unjustified. Nothing can be perfect or right per definition. A five star hotel has to offer more and to work harder than a youth hostel. But five star hotels have higher prices. :-)
Escorts want to know name and hotel information of their clients. They want to be paid in advance. Sometimes they tend to offer more in their ads than they can provide in reality and are sometimes on a dirty rip off strategy.

As far as I know, this website has the best review system. It should be used with responsibility. Be careful with "spam reviews", do not fake and defame, but tell the objective truth.

Toni

Fully agree with you ToniW.
But I also like to point out that some responses to critical reviews do not try to come up with standard excuses (rare but happens).
Some time ago some guy posted bad review about Candy but her response was very professional. In fact she impressed me.

I have a quick question regarding this topic.

Am I to understand that any "active" hobbyst can leave a "positive" or "negative" review WITHOUT ever engaging the escort?

Are there not a checks and balances mechanism here to insure that reviews are truthful? That is, that the hobbyst did indeed engage the services of the escort?

If an escort has 10+ 4 or 5 star reviews, and then is saddled with a single 1 or 2 star negative review, the Administrator can not see what has transpired? I would think the Administrator could see right through this and should expunge the fictional review as a consequence.

This situation is analagous to how the eBay feedback system first started. In it's inception, buyer or seller could leave negative feedback - whether it was original or retaliatory. Then, the system morphed to where negative feedback comments could be removed by mutual consent of both buyer and seller. The final evolution (now in it's current state) is that only the buyer can leave negative feedback. The seller can not leave any feedback but positive. The seller is at the complete mercy of the buyer. The seller may have given exceptional service, but the buyer can still leave nagative feedback. This is patently unfair IMO.

I suppose the only recourse an escort now has if a prospective hobbyst leaves unwarranted fictional negative review is by the following:

1. Post a professional explanatory comment in the negative review itself
2. Post a warning when submitting a reference for the hobbyst in question
3. Post what exactly the OP has done here in the "warnings" section of the Escorts Board - telling other escorts of her negative experience so they may avoid the same pitfalls with a particular hobbyst
4. Place the hobbyst on her "black list" as well as her "ignored list"

I am sorry to hear this happened to you, sexy hot kiss. We can only hope all rational hobbysts will see through the charade this malevolent hobbyst has done to your reputation.

I apologize for another post in your thread, but I just checked out your reviews:

http://www.escortpersonalads.com/escort_reviews/523202/

I see nothing but 4 and 5 star reviews.

Can you please point to me where the culprit negative review is?

Thank you for your valuable time.

EROTICSYNERGY.

I can tell you for a fact to men left me review it not real. To be honest I did not see them first. One of my client contact me on yahoo messanger and say is it true. These men were both Indian and I never meet them. I do not think Indian men are less people then any an from any where but I am just not attracted to have sex with them. SOme think if they have the money I wll sex no matter who it is and maybe some girl do but I do not. SO a few indian men get very angry and call me many name and 2 post here I met them. One even said I had diease. I just sent admin a copy of emails I send to them saying no thank you about meet and admin deleted them both.

But I do think you need to give admin some kind of proof or how they know who say real?