Forum - reviews

You ever notice that when you are with a client most times they wont leave a review when they really enjoyed their time with you even after they say they will leave a review. But the moment they have a terrible time they give a girl a bad review. Its never happened to me thank god but Id really like to know why a guy gets lazy and wont take the time to give a girl a review.

Mmm...
Perhaps you're right but it sounds a bit pessimistic anyway. I'm sure there is nothing to mind if girl asks me kindly to review her!I think that many other men also would not mind.

Dear Raina, you may be sure that quite not all the disappointed hobbyists post negative reviews.

i agree with you, i am afraid that it is only the people that have bad experiences that will more likely post something and that the people that have enjoyed themselves wont write a review

Some guys who wants to be regular will keep his happiness quiet because he does not want others to read and share his favorite girl with others. I know some providers offer 10% off from regular price for second time if the customer writes a favorable review after the first time.

I have mixed emotions about writting a bad review but some of the young ladies that are listed on this board are playing games with the hobbyists. When that happens a bad review is deserved.

I think not a "bad" but critical and true. I think these moments are most important. And of course good will amap.

Well ... I've never left a review for any escort ... neither good nor bad. It's not a case of being lazy; I guess I'm just an old fashioned kind of guy - I believe that whatever happens in the privacy of my hotel room is exactly that: Private!

But, I can state quite categorically that no escort has ever asked me to post a review. From my point of view (as a customer), I would be quite horrified if escorts started discussing me on a public website and gave me marks out of 10 for attractiveness, physical features, sexual technique, etc. I've always imagined that the ladies I meet would feel the same way about having their intimate details discussed in public.

I guess that if a lady did ask me to, then I might write something very basic along the lines that she was genuine, reliable and pleasant company. But it would not be truly impartial: if I had any intention of meeting her again in the future, then I would be very reluctant to say anything even slightly negative.

I agree with you. Any intimate encounter is unique for the two persons involved. You don't 'click' with everyone you meet. I don't like intimate details discussed in public.

The problem with rating someone is that it gets very personal. Truth is that it hurts to have something negative said about you. Its a universal reaction. I guarantee that someone will always have something negative to say. And yes, you would be horrified to hear what escorts would say if client reviews were given out.

Thanks for your comments.

--------------------
An elegant courtesan among Calgary escorts, providing vip executive escort companionship to business travelers. Experience elite GFE, fetish, and domination services from the best of Calgary escorts.

I don't agree with you on this dom the reason why is as you know reviews make or break you in this business. It sets girls apart from great providers to terrible ones. It gives future clients a way of seeing if a girl is worth spend money and time with. If you provide a great service you should welcome reviews. Ive talked to clients and they have stated they wont even see a girl unless she has reviews for a few reasons one being she is not L.E and two she is not a waste of time. While men don't have to give a detailed review they can just say Ive been with so and so It was a great time will see her again, this is a accepted review without leaving revealing details. Also as a provider I never review a client on a board unless they ask to be.

Aaaahh ... "L.E." ... fortunately, that's not an issue for me, but I can see that it might be a major concern for some. If I thought there was the slightest possibility that the woman coming up to my room was intending to arrest me, then I guess I'd take a different approach ... or most likely, I wouldn't even be involved in the first place.

But, you know ... just to emphasise that there is a different world out there ... I personally make a point of avoiding any escort who has a string of reviews published on the Net. Why? Well, [to me] it creates the impression that she's a hardened pro, rather than a part timer. I have generally found that part timers are more easy going and are in the business for a bit of fun, just as much as for the money. But ... I guess that just goes to prove that there is no such person as the "average customer" - the market is segmented into groups with different "wants and needs" (as my Economics lecturer used to drill into me - LOL!). All the best :-)

Interesting. But I think that many reviews cannot always be considered as a sign that she is a "hardened pro". There are many other factors and signs (pics, ads, blog etc)

A hardened pro huh. Ok how is that different than having a wife and sleeping with her 3 or 4 times a day everyday? Does that make her a hardened pro also? In fact if you sleep with a girl that many times a day wouldnt you being a guy wouldnt that make you a hardened Pro?

I know lots of girls that do this part time and have lots of reviews then again I know part timers that have been with lots of guys and have no reviews. So the point you make swaledale doesnt hold alot of water cause you could get a part timer and been with just as many men as a fulltimer! Some full time girls only see maybe 2 guys a day and take days off or a week or two at a time.

Oh! Marriage as a Special Case of Prostitution... :)))))

My definition of a "hardened pro" would be a woman who provides sex for money and is reliant on this money as her main (or only) form of income; the opposite would be an "amateur" - a woman who has a conventional day job, but does occasional escort work (with or without sex) to supplement her regular income.



I guess there is no realistic way of establishing whether my reasoning is sound or not. I can only speak from my own personal experience: an absence of reviews is one of the criteria I use to select a suitable escort, and based on my results to date, I have no inclination to change my tactics. I just think it's worthwhile considering that whilst having a string of reviews will certainly help filter in those clients seeking a well-reviewed escort, you may well be filtering out potential clients looking for a more "amateur" experience.

Although I've never knowingly dated an escort who has been reviewed on the Net, there was one occasion of a lady on this site being reviewed some time after I met her myself.

It's hard to say who is the "best" escort I ever met; how do you define "best"? But, there have been three professional escorts in my life who stand out as being truly wonderful companions - each in their own unique way. One of those ladies was "Emma". I dated "Emma" on three separate occasions, and would have met her more times if she hadn't moved out to the provinces. She removed her ad from this site over a year ago, but her review still exists in the archives:
Review of Emma

And the moral is ... well, maybe I ought to start actively seeking out those escorts who have BAD reviews! <LOL> But, seriously, you just cannot generalise what the "average client" is looking for. We're all different, just as you are all different, and we all have different "wants and needs" (to return to Marketing speak!)