Get Adobe Flash player
Home  News  Ads  Reviews  Galleries  Blogs  Forum  Articles  Search  FAQ  Help 

A Rose by Any Other Name ...

Having always been a big fan of words I found myself following a recent thread on a friend's mailing list with great interest. The heart of the thread was the unflattering euphemisms that have been tacked onto providers and the business in general and whether or not there were, or could be, something more descriptive and less demeaning.

<em>One poster wrote:

[...]what terms could possibly be of use? I think the word tryst has a very good sound and is very descriptive. So, providers could be called trysters. If however, you wanted to intensify it by the type of provider, "tryster" could refer to a GFE, tryxter to a PSE, and tryxxter to a very wild PSE.</em>

Ha! "Tryxter" makes me think of an 80's hair band. In fact, I think ... hang on ... yup: <a href="http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/id_18039/artist.jhtml " target="_blank">Trixter</a> - "Give It To Me Good", circa 1990. More a "Baby Metal" band than a hair band, I guess, but the song fits, lol.

There are/have been quite a few labels for providers and the profession over the years. Some of them don't make any sense to me and some of them seem to refer more to women who give it away rather than those who make a living doing it, but they're all colorful and descriptive:
<!--break-->
<em>Adventuress, asphalt angel, B-girl, bag, bangtail (<em>apparently 19th century slang for whore</em>), bawd, bimbo, blower, 'bo, Brass Flute (<em>British rhyming slang for prostitute</em>), broad, call girl, camp follower, cat, chicken, chippie, comfort woman (<em>Japanese</em>), companion, concubine, courtesan, doxy, fancy girl, fancy woman, fallen woman, flatbacker (<em>GI Joe slang for prostitute</em>), frail sister, French velvet, floozy, harlot, ho', hoochie, hooker, hoor, hostess, hussy, hustler, lady of the evening, lady/woman of the night, lady of ill-fame/easy virtue/ill-repute, loose woman, lot lizard, jezebel, lost sister, midnight cowboy (<em>?</em>), model (<em>?</em>), moll, nymphomaniac, painted lady/woman, party girl, pickup, pink pants (<em>lol</em>), prairie dove, pro, professional girlfriend, public woman, red light lady, round heels, saloon belle, sex worker, slattern, scarlet woman, shady lady, slut, sportin' girl/woman, street angel, streetwalker, strumpet, tart, tomato, tramp, trollop, vamp, wench, white slave, whore, working girl ... and my all time favorite: soiled dove.</em>

There are very few of those words, taken out of context, that don't immediately make it very clear what someone is talking about. Companion and hostess are actually the only two that don't immediately bring the profession to mind. Unless of course, you're in a conversation specifically about prostitution.

I've had occasion over the years to be on the receiving end of a few of derogatory terms slut and tramp come immediately to mind by women who took offense at me for one reason or another, usually because their man (<em>or some man they <strong>wished</strong> were theirs</em>) paid too much attention to me. When I was younger my feelings were hurt at the contempt those women held for me. It was only after I grew older, and wiser, that I understood their taunts could be considered more of a compliment than an insult.

The truth is that women as a whole, are evil, catty and insecure creatures. Finding themselves, or even thinking themselves lacking in any way, the female will attack that which is threatening their self-confidence in the most derogatory manner possible. So the pretty, funny, confident woman/girl/young mother at the bar/nightclub/supermarket automatically becomes a whore or a slut.

Similarly, if the insults were coming from men, I came to recognize them as thinly veiled episodes of sour grapes. Men, to a lesser extent, but much in the same way, will deride or verbally degrade that which they want, but can't have. In their roundabout way of thinking, men will tell themselves that if a woman doesn't want them, she must be useless and not good enough for them. Men will try to convince themselves, and anybody that will listen, of her non-existent virtue and obvious lack of worth.

On the other hand, my husband has called me those same words in the midst of passion and not only haven't I taken offense, I've found myself more excited, actually driven, to act the part. (<em>Of course, if he called me a slut in the middle of an argument it would probably earn him a shot to the balls. No doubt there's a lesson to be learned there somewhere.</em>)

These days, due in no small part to my maturity and the growth of a somewhat thicker skin, I find myself embracing and, at times, reveling in some derogatory insults. For instance, I take great delight in being referred to as a "bitch". I've worked very hard over the years to earn that name and I deserve it. "Trailer trash" and "Biker bitch" are two more terms that I don't have a problem with these days.

What it boils down to, and always has, is a lesson I learned when I was about fourteen years old: I know what I'm doing and the people that I love know what I'm doing. That's all that matters. That's all that should matter.

The rest of the world be damned.

Added on: 11/15/05 11:43

Comments


69Design
11/15/05 12:39
Your quote "Men, to a lesser extent, but much in the same way, will deride or verbally degrade that which they want, but can't have. In their roundabout way of thinking, men will tell themselves that if a woman doesn't want them, she must be useless and not good enough for them. Men will try to convince themselves, and anybody that will listen, of her non-existent virtue and obvious lack of worth."

Generalisations (as someone in the escort industry really should appreciate) are by their very definition almost always bound to be wrong... we (men) do not all conform to some feminist stereotype. People, regardless of the gender, race or anything else should be judged as individuals and treated with respect.


Bella
11/15/05 13:04
Just a personal observation, and as you said, a generalization. No offense meant. However, generalizations and stereotypes exist because - well because they EXIST.

If you like I can add a disclaimer to the entry, or remove the offsive remark?

quote :

Your quote "Men, to a lesser extent, but much in the same way, will deride or verbally degrade that which they want, but can't have. In their roundabout way of thinking, men will tell themselves that if a woman doesn't want them, she must be useless and not good enough for them. Men will try to convince themselves, and anybody that will listen, of her non-existent virtue and obvious lack of worth."

Generalisations (as someone in the escort industry really should appreciate) are by their very definition almost always bound to be wrong... we (men) do not all conform to some feminist stereotype. People, regardless of the gender, race or anything else should be judged as individuals and treated with respect.


69Design
11/15/05 13:26
just my opinion, your entitled to yours just as much as i am to mine.... :-)


Anika Mae
11/15/05 14:44
There are very few of those words, taken out of context, that don't immediately make it very clear what someone is talking about. Companion and hostess are actually the only two that don't immediately bring the profession to mind.

Context or not, I'd be pretty confused if someone called me a tomato!

As for generalisations, I think it's always a good idea to make it clear when you're using them consciously. There's no reason for someone to assume that you're not tarring an entire group of people with the same brush unless they already have an idea of your opinions on the matter.


Bella
11/15/05 15:51
I honestly have no intention of offending anybody here, but it seems I keep doing that exact thing.

I didn't make up any of these words, or their historical meanings - I believe tomato was a term used by American men of Sinatra's day to describe a woman, i.e. "hot tomato".

Further, a blog by loose definition, is a collection of thoughts. In this case, my thoughts. Just by virtue of writing what I wrote I think it's pretty clear that I was using my words "consciously". I didn't call anybody any of those words, just listed them. I gave examples of things that had happened to me in my past and related my opinions as to those events ... exactly which group of people did did you assume me to be "tarring"?

Perhaps I misunderstood the term blogging as related to Punterlink. Perhaps I should be adding footnotes and explanations to every post I make, in order to make it clear that what I write is just my opinion and not necessarily ... what?

I guess I don't understand Anika Mae, exactly what type of faux pas you think I've made. I've been blogging for over seven years, but perhaps I missed something in this site's general rules?

quote Mae :

There are very few of those words, taken out of context, that don't immediately make it very clear what someone is talking about. Companion and hostess are actually the only two that don't immediately bring the profession to mind.

Context or not, I'd be pretty confused if someone called me a tomato!

As for generalisations, I think it's always a good idea to make it clear when you're using them consciously. There's no reason for someone to assume that you're not tarring an entire group of people with the same brush unless they already have an idea of your opinions on the matter.


Bella
11/15/05 15:52
Thank you! ;)

quote :
just my opinion, your entitled to yours just as much as i am to mine.... :-)


Anika Mae
11/15/05 17:22
Sorry, it's the perils of text-based communication at work. Apparently my comment was awfully unclear. There's no offense on my part.

The "tomato" comment was simply a response to this specific line: "Companion and hostess are actually the only two that don't immediately bring the profession to mind." There are other words in that list that do not imply prostitution when taken out of context, and a few that wouldn't make any sense to me even with the context. I was amused, not offended!

The "generalisations" comment was in no way related to the list, but to your conversation with 69Design. You acknowledge (I think), that while they usually have a basis in reality, they seldom apply to all members of a group. (That's what I mean by using generalisations consciously: as generalisations, not innate charecteristics or anything silly like that.) I was just saying that I think it's wise to make it clear that you realise that when stating generalisations, in any medium, to avoid your words being mis-intepreted by those who'll be upset, and mis-used by those who don't get the finer details.

(Also, I keep forgetting that I need to use "em" here, and my "i" tags will dissapear into nothing. I doubt proper formating would have made things much clearer, but it's annoying when I don't notice in time to edit.)


Bella
11/16/05 09:50
quote Mae :

Sorry, it's the perils of text-based communication at work. Apparently my comment was awfully unclear. There's no offense on my part.


I apologize as well. For as long as I've been doing this I forget - A LOT - that what's written can sometimes be taken the wrong way.

I just like to write, and I usually write what's on my mind without intending to offend anybody. I suppose I SHOULD put a disclaimer on my entries empahsizing that fact. A sort of "no offense meant - owner's brain in ramble gear" thing.

Thanks for the feedback, in any case.



BellaDonna - Toxic Beauty


Only site members can place comments. Please, login first, if you want to submit a comment.